Home » 2025

Yearly Archives: 2025

Follow Principal Notes on WordPress.com

Sandwich Prayers

Volunteers at Sack Lunch make about fifty sandwiches at a time by spreading bread over a long make-table. Need a hundred sandwiches? Do two rotations. Pretty simple.

This morning’s sandwiches were ham and cheese. My favorite part is the last step when you wrap sandwiches in thin aluminum foil squares. It’s a simple, relaxing task. I thought of a song by Carrie Newcomer in which she reviews tasks from a typical day and how they can become holy. The lyric, “folding sheets like folding hands / to pray as only laundry can,” reminded me of wrapping sandwiches. 

So, as I folded the squares of tin foil, I found myself saying a short prayer for whoever might receive each sandwich.  May the hands that receive this gain strength and sense the love of Christ.

Simply by a whispered prayer, wrapping sandwiches at Sack Lunch became a meaningful time of worship for which I’m thankful.

Later my wife, Becca, assembled sack lunches that we passed along to our guests. As guests expressed thanks for their meals, I thought of the sandwich-wrapping prayer and began to better understand that these men, women, and children were brothers and sisters created in the image of God. In their receiving they were giving me a blessing. One long-time volunteer said, “In serving those in need, both the server and those being served are blessed.” 

You may donate to Sack Lunch at this link, scrolling down to the Sack Lunch category. The need in our community is great. If you or someone you know is in need, stop in for a sack breakfast or lunch at 317 North F Street, Fort Smith, AR. Sack Lunch volunteers come from all walks of life and represent a variety of area churches and organizations.

Here’s a link to Carrie Newcomer’s song that inspired the sandwich-wrapping prayer…

Collect for Sack LunchO God, you teach us that Christ might be found in those who hunger and thirst. Help us to see your divinity in all people, especially those in need. Thank you for the blessings we receive in giving and help us be mindful that small acts of service may become acts of worship and thanksgiving.  

Crawford County Retired Teachers Programs for 2025-26

We’re excited about the programs we have lined up for this year. It’s fun to build relationships with retired teachers in our region and to continue learning about our schools and communities. Below is a list of our programs scheduled for this year. Photos below are from Jill Thompson’s excellent Oct. 8 program. This post is intended for the October 23 retired teachers’ session on programing.

Thursday September 11th we will meet in Fort Smith with Fort Smith Retired Teachers

Wednesday October 8th  Jill Thompson jithompson@alz.org Program Director for the Alzheimer’s Association here in Arkansas. 

Wednesday November 12th Mike McSpadden to discuss his book, Only One Airedale: An Integration Story

Wednesday December 10th (no presenter needed) 

Wednesday March 11, 2026 Alma Agri program – Kisia Holland & Grace Hewat / Location: Alma High School Agri Building 

Wednesday April 8, 2026 Monarch 61 Project – Wellness  info@monarch61.com Nicole Walton, Executive Director / Location: 105 N 28th St. Suite D, Van Buren, AR 72956

Wednesday May 13, 2026 Current trends in assessment – Jami Ann Balkman, Alma School District


Recommendations for planning and scheduling programs:

  • Schedule far in advance 
  • Make a letter that includes details of the flow of your meetings and then customize it based on who you’re contacting. 
  • Time:
  • Topic:
  • Audience:
  • Meal schedule and presentation length. 
  • Determine logistics and tech needs. 

Still Learning to Read

According to a September 2, 2025 article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, the Arkansas commissioner of education said that as students move from third to fourth grade they move from “learning to read” to “reading to learn.”

I disagree. This often-repeated simplistic statement about reading doesn’t describe the complexity of young brains (or old) gleaning information from text. We are always reading to learn, and we are always learning to read.

When children open books before being able to decode the words they’re reading to learn, gathering information from text and illustrations. As an adult, when I’m faced with new types of information or unfamiliar concepts, I’m still learning to read. I’m adding new vocabulary. I’m sounding out words or looking up definitions of unfamiliar words.

We never stop learning to read and our commissioner of education should deepen legislators’ understanding of education rather than reinforce tired old education clichés.

Senate Bill 433…Whose Religion?

The recent passing of Senate Bill 433 brought up a memory from the past. On the morning after September 11, 2001, I remember saying the pledge of allegiance and hearing voices crack including mine. Then came the moment of silence. It was meaningful and I understood that some children cried softly. If a verbal prayer had been led by someone in authority, that moment would have been lost. Religion wasn’t forced, but it was allowed. That’s as it should be in the United States. If a child wants to bring his Bible (or another sacred scripture) to school, or pray quietly, that’s permitted in public schools.

Senate Bill 433 requires the display of our National Motto (In God We Trust) and The Ten Commandments in all Arkansas public school classrooms. This text must be on a “durable poster.” The motto poster must be “at least 11×14 inches.” The Ten Commandments must be displayed on a poster or in a frame of “at least 16×20 inches.” The specifics of size and font size seemed a little over the top but I’m sure they worried that some would place the ten commandments on a post-it note. Then the law appears to require that the text be displayed in the King James Version, a translation that many readers (including me) avoid. The law specifies “the Ten Commandments shall read as follows:”

“The Ten Commandments

I am the Lord thy God.

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images.

Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.

Honor thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land

which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

Thou shalt not kill.

Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Thou shalt not steal.

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house.

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his

maidservant, nor his cattle, nor anything that is thy neighbor’s.”

No scripture reference is included which seemed odd. Might an inquisitive child wonder where these old English texts came from or why “the ten commandments” appear in two separate Hebrew Bible scrolls but with different wording?

I did some searching and most posters were from $10-20. I did not find a poster with the exact wording as given in this law but I’m sure they can be found or made. 

As someone who appreciates the study of religious texts, I am troubled by the notion of compulsory displays of religious text in public educational settings. Such mandates may foster resentment rather than reverence and can serve to alienate those of different faiths or no faith at all. 

Now we’ll watch our state waste resources and lawyering on lawsuits that will be generated by this arguably unconstitutional law. All of this is so unnecessary. 

Link to the Senate Bill: https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/86/5b/f4e05f594a1f981d511d467b6789/sb433.pdf

For further reading: Steven Kurtz’s Substack: Should We Display the Ten Commandments?

School Yard Bullying on a International Stage

I watched the February 28, 2025 discussion that occurred between the US Administration and Volodymyr Zelenskyy. I felt an overwhelming sadness mixed with anger and realized this exchange reminded me of how school yard bullies gang up on a lone victim who is in a lesser or weaker position. 

I read a post that claimed to be ChatGPT AI analysis and decided to try submitting the text of that Feb. 28 exchange myself. The portion I submitted in pasted at the end of the following Chat GPT Analysis.

Chat GPT Analysis was generated on March 2, 2025

The Associated Press transcript you provided involved Donald Trump, JD Vance, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In this exchange, several types of manipulation and rhetorical tactics are evident. Here’s an analysis of some of the manipulative strategies and dynamics at play:

1. **Deflection and Denial**: When Zelenskyy brings up the historical context of Russia’s aggression, Trump deflects by stating, “Oh, 2014? I was not here,” implying that he cannot be held accountable for actions that occurred before his presidency. Vance supports this deflection by affirming Trump’s statement.

2. **Gaslighting**: Vance accuses Zelenskyy of being disrespectful for discussing Ukraine’s challenges in the Oval Office and implies that Zelenskyy should be grateful for U.S. efforts. This can be seen as an attempt to make Zelenskyy question his own perceptions and experiences (“You should be thanking the president”).

3. **Dismissal of Concerns**: When Zelenskyy tries to explain the severity of the situation in Ukraine and the failure of past diplomacy, Vance dismisses his concerns by suggesting Zelenskyy is offering a “propaganda tour” and questions his military recruitment, rather than addressing the substantive issues Zelenskyy raises.

4. **Intimidation and Threats**: Trump’s statements such as “You’re gambling with World War III” and “You’re not in a good position” are meant to intimidate Zelenskyy and undermine his stance. Trump suggests that without U.S. support, Ukraine is powerless, which is a tactic to assert dominance and control over the conversation.

5. **Demanding Gratitude**: Both Trump and Vance repeatedly demand that Zelenskyy express gratitude, which is a tactic to shift the focus from substantive issues to a question of manners and to imply that Ukraine’s survival is contingent on U.S. benevolence alone.

6. **False Dichotomy**: Trump presents the situation as if the only options are a ceasefire or a continuation of the war, ignoring the possibility of other diplomatic solutions or support that could be offered to Ukraine.

7. **Personal Attacks and Undermining**: Trump and Vance make personal attacks on Biden and Obama, suggesting that they were disrespected by Putin, while Trump was not. This tactic is used to undermine the credibility of their predecessors and to elevate Trump’s own status.

8. **Projection of Strength**: Trump repeatedly emphasizes his own strength and the respect he believes he commands from Putin, suggesting that this respect is a form of leverage in the situation. This is a tactic to project power and influence.

9. **Manipulation of the Media**: Trump’s final comments about the exchange being “great television” suggest a manipulation of the media narrative, using the situation for political theater rather than engaging in a serious policy discussion.

Overall, this exchange demonstrates various manipulative tactics, including deflection, gaslighting, dismissal, intimidation, demanding gratitude, false dichotomy, personal attacks, projection of strength, and media manipulation. These strategies are designed to control the narrative, assert dominance, and evade accountability for complex international issues.


Vance: “For four years, the United States of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is, maybe, engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States’ words mattered more than the president of the United States’ actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That’s what President Trump is doing.”

Zelenskyy: “Can I ask you?”

Vance: “Sure. Yeah.” 

Zelenskyy: “OK. So he (Putin) occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of east and Crimea. So he occupied it in 2014. So during a lot of years — I’m not speaking about just Biden, but those times was (Barack) Obama, then President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, now President Trump. And God bless, now, President Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the –“

Trump: “2015?”

Zelenskyy: “2014.”

Trump: “Oh, 2014? I was not here.”

Vance: “That’s exactly right.”

Zelenskyy: “Yes, but during 2014 ‘til 2022, the situation is the same, that people have been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like, you, president, in 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, (French President Emmanuel) Macron and (former German Chancellor Angela) Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go … But after that, he broke the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn’t exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners. But he didn’t do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What do you mean?”

Vance: “I’m talking about the kind of diplomacy that’s going to end the destruction of your country. Mr. President, with respect, I think it’s disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict.”

Zelenskyy: “Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?”

Vance: “I have been to –”

Zelenskyy: “Come once.”

Vance: “I’ve actually watched and seen the stories, and I know that what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you’ve had problems, bringing people into your military?”

Zelenskyy: “We have problems –”

Vance: “And do you think that is respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?”

Zelenskyy: “A lot of questions. Let’s start from the beginning.”

Vance: “Sure.”

Zelenskyy: “First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don’t feel now. But you will feel it in the future. God bless –”

Trump: “You don’t know that. You don’t know that. Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel. We’re trying to solve a problem. Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel.”

Zelenskyy: “I’m not telling you. I am answering on these questions.”

Trump: “Because you’re in no position to dictate that.”

Vance: “That’s exactly what you’re doing.”

Trump: “You are in no position to dictate what we’re going to feel. We’re going to feel very good.”

Zelenskyy: “You will feel influenced.”

Trump: “We are going to feel very good and very strong.”

Zelenskyy: “I am telling you. You will feel influenced.”

Trump: “You’re, right now, not in a very good position. You’ve allowed yourself to be in a very bad position –”

Zelenskyy: “From the very beginning of the war —”

Trump: “You’re not in a good position. You don’t have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards.”

Zelenskyy: “I’m not playing cards. I’m very serious, Mr. President. I’m very serious.”

Trump: “You’re playing cards. You’re gambling with the lives of millions of people. You’re gambling with World War III.”

Zelenskyy: “What are you speaking about?”

Trump: “You’re gambling with World War III. And what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.”

Vance: “Have you said thank you once?”

Zelenskyy: “A lot of times. Even today.”

Vance: “No, in this entire meeting. You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October.”

Zelenskyy: “No.”

Vance: “Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who’s trying to save your country.”

Zelenskyy: “Please. You think that if you will speak very loudly about the war, you can –”

Trump: “He’s not speaking loudly. He’s not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble.”

Zelenskyy: “Can I answer —”

Trump: “No, no. You’ve done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.” 

Zelenskyy: “I know. I know.” 

Trump: “You’re not winning. You’re not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us.” 

Zelenskyy: “Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we’ve been alone. And we are thankful. I said thanks.”

Trump: “If you didn’t have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.”

Zelenskyy: “In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days.” 

Trump: “Maybe less. It’s going to be a very hard thing to do business like this, I tell you.

Vance: “Just say thank you.”

Zelenskyy: “I said a lot of times, thank you, to American people.”

Vance: “Accept that there are disagreements, and let’s go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you’re wrong. We know that you’re wrong.”

Trump: “But you see, I think it’s good for the American people to see what’s going on. I think it’s very important. That’s why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful.”

Zelenskyy: “I’m thankful.”

Trump: “You don’t have the cards. You’re buried there. People are dying. You’re running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing, and then you tell us, ‘I don’t want a ceasefire. I don’t want a ceasefire, I want to go, and I want this.’ Look, if you can get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed.”

Zelenskyy: “Of course we want to stop the war. But I said to you, with guarantees.”

Trump: “Are you saying you don’t want a ceasefire? I want a ceasefire. Because you’ll get a ceasefire faster than an agreement.”

Zelenskyy: “Ask our people about a ceasefire, what they think.”

Trump: “That wasn’t with me. That was with a guy named Biden, who is not a smart person.”

Zelenskyy: “This is your president. It was your president.”

Trump: “Excuse me. That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I gave you Javelins. I gave you the Javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins. You’ve got to be more thankful because let me tell you, you don’t have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don’t have any cards.”

Vance, restating a reporter’s question: “She is asking what if Russia breaks the ceasefire.” 

Trump: “What, if anything? What if the bomb drops on your head right now? OK, what if they broke it? I don’t know, they broke it with Biden because Biden, they didn’t respect him. They didn’t respect Obama. They respect me. Let me tell you, Putin went through a hell of a lot with me. He went through a phony witch hunt … All I can say is this. He might have broken deals with Obama and Bush, and he might have broken them with Biden. He did, maybe. Maybe he did. I don’t know what happened, but he didn’t break them with me. He wants to make a deal. I don’t know if you can make a deal.”

“The problem is I’ve empowered you (turning toward Zelenskyy) to be a tough guy, and I don’t think you’d be a tough guy without the United States. And your people are very brave. But you’re either going to make a deal or we’re out. And if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty, but you’ll fight it out. But you don’t have the cards. But once we sign that deal, you’re in a much better position, but you’re not acting at all thankful. And that’s not a nice thing. I’ll be honest. That’s not a nice thing. 

“All right, I think we’ve seen enough. What do you think? This is going to be great television. I will say that.”

Getting Your First Teaching Job

As a former school principal, I reviewed countless applications, cover letters, and resumes. I’ve interviewed many applicants and contacted numerous references. Through these experiences, I’ve gathered insights on what makes a successful job candidate.

Printed Materials:

Cover Letter: Remember that both your cover letter and resume will be read by a school administrator who may not have experience in your teaching field. Avoid acronyms that might confuse. For example, as a music teacher, I would want to avoid saying I was an active member in ASBOA, and write instead, Arkansas School Band and Orchestra Association. Aim for a one-page cover letter and write with clear, short sentences. Your letter will typically be skimmed quickly. 

Resume: Highlight relevant achievements like participating in all-region or all-state ensembles. Include community service, leadership, and extra-curricular activities that are relevant. Provide up-to-date contact information for references, ensuring they’re aware and agreeable to being listed. References can range from college professors to your part-time job supervisor. Dependability and good character are what administrators are looking for, so include people who can speak to that. 

Proofreading: Always have someone else review your cover letter and resume before submission.

Social Media Presence: Consider your audience, which now includes parents, students, colleagues, and administrators. Ensure your social media reflects your professionalism and dedication to teaching. A photo of you under the influence while partying it up in college might be a deal breaker in some communities.

In-Person Interactions:

First Impressions: The school secretary or other staff members you first encounter can influence the hiring decision. On several occasions, my secretary texted me and said there was someone in the office I might like to meet. I knew what this meant and raced to the office. Those applicants got my attention because they impressed others and were courteous. Make a positive impression on everyone you meet, from custodial staff to administrative assistants. 

Research: Familiarize yourself with the school’s culture by visiting its website. Understand what the school values and how it operates.

Questions: Anticipate interview questions. Think through your possible responses.

Appearance: Dress professionally. Your appearance reflects respect for the school and those you hope to work with.

Interviewers: It doesn’t hurt to check the social media of those who will conduct the interview. You don’t want to come across too familiar but having some idea of their interests and family might help you establish rapport. 

Self-Assessment: Remember that you’re also evaluating whether the school is the right fit for you. Prepare questions that will help you assess if the school’s core values align with yours.

Post-Interview: A courteous follow-up call or email to thank the interviewers and reaffirm your interest can leave a positive impression. While not mandatory, a thank-you note can be a memorable touch.